18.1 Unsatisfactory academic progress is defined as failure by a candidate to do one or more of the following:
- maintain regular and frequent contact with their supervisors, including attendance at scheduled meetings;
- make application for ethics approval, where required, in a timely manner;
- submit data outputs or drafts of written work as agreed;
- participate in work-in-progress seminars;
- undertake research training activities, as requested by the their supervisors;
- adhere to agreed timelines for progress and completion; and
- achieve any other agreed goals.
18.2 A Faculty Associate Dean Research who is of the view that a candidate is not making satisfactory academic progress following:
- review of the annual Academic Progress Report; or
- at other times, upon advice and the receipt of supporting documentation provided by the Principal Supervisor;
will notify the candidate in writing that their academic progress is under review. The candidate will be asked to develop a completion plan, in consultation with their Principal Supervisor, which must include a timeline and clearly articulated monthly goals. The completion plan must be endorsed by the Faculty Associate Dean Research within 20 working days of the candidate being notified that such a plan is required; a copy of the plan must be retained by the Faculty Associate Dean Research and a copy forwarded to the Manager, Graduate Research.
18.3 Should the candidate fail to meet one or more of the monthly goals articulated in the completion plan, the Faculty Associate Dean Research may recommend to the Dean of Research that the candidate’s enrolment be terminated. The recommendation must include supporting documentation.
18.4 The Dean of Research will notify the candidate in writing that the Faculty Associate Dean Research has recommended that their enrolment be terminated, and that the recommendation will be considered by the Research Candidate Academic Progress Committee. The candidate will be provided with a copy of the recommendation for termination of their enrolment.
18.5 The Dean of Research will invite the candidate to respond to the recommendation and make submissions as to why their enrolment should not be terminated. The Dean of Research may request further information or advice from the candidate, the candidate’s Supervisors and/or Faculty Associate Dean Research, or any other relevant person.
18.6 If a candidate’s response and/or submissions include allegations of misconduct of a member of staff which may be in contravention of the StaffCode of Conduct, the Dean of Research will seek the advice of the Director, Human Resources, as to whether the matter should be considered under the Staff Code of Conduct. If a process under the Staff Code of Conduct is commenced, the Dean of Research may suspend the academic progress process pending the outcome of the Staff Code of Conduct process.
18.7 The Dean of Research will convene a meeting of the Research Candidate Academic Progress Committee to consider the recommendation, including the supporting documentation, as well as the candidate’s response and submissions, and any further information and/or advice received. The Committee will comprise:
- the Dean of Research (Chair);
- an Associate Dean Research from a Faculty other than the one in which the candidate is enrolled (nominated by the Dean of Research); and
- the Manager, Graduate Research.
A person who was involved in making the recommendation to terminate the candidate’s enrolment will not be appointed to the Committee.
The meeting may be held by telephone or other electronic means. All members of the Committee must attend for the meeting to be quorate.
18.8 The Research Candidate Academic Progress Committee may decide that:
- the candidate’s academic progress is satisfactory and that their enrolment continue;
- the candidate’s enrolment continue on a probationary basis subject to certain conditions being met (failure to meet the conditions will result in termination of enrolment); or
- the candidate’s enrolment be terminated for unsatisfactory academic progress.
18.9 Normally within 10 working days of a decision by the Research Candidate Academic Progress Committee, the Dean of Research will notify the candidate in writing of the decision, the reasons for the decision, and, if the decision is to terminate enrolment, the circumstances under which the candidate may submit an appeal against the decision (refer section 23). In the case of an international candidate whose enrolment has been terminated, the candidate will also be notified of the possible implications of the decision on their visa status.
18.10 A copy of the decision will be provided to the candidate’s Supervisors and Faculty Associate Dean Research, and any other staff members who may need to take action as a result of the decision. A copy of the decision will be held by Graduate Research in the candidate’s electronic file and, if the decision is to terminate enrolment, reported to the University Research Committee.