Part C - Dealing with Alleged Breaches of Academic Honesty
13. Principles for dealing with an alleged breach of academic honesty
Any case of alleged breach of academic honesty will be dealt with by procedures which ensure:
- equity;
- consistency;
- procedural fairness;
- timely resolution of the case; and
- achievement of appropriate and effective outcomes.
In any case in which a Lecturer-in-Charge, Course Coordinator, Head of School, Dean or other University officer has an oral communication with a student regarding a matter under this Policy, that officer will make a written note of such communication and retain it within the appropriate file(s).
14. Academic assessment of work which includes evidence of academic dishonesty
14.1 In determining the result which a student should receive in a unit, the Head of School or Lecturer-in-Charge may consider not only the results of all work submitted for assessment but also the student’s compliance with University requirements for academic honesty.
15. Responsibility for dealing with matters of academic dishonesty
15.1 Any breach of University standards of academic honesty will be dealt with in accordance with this Policy or with Statute 10 Student Conduct and Discipline.
15.2 Failure to comply with the University’s standards for academic honesty may lead to failure in the assessment task or failure overall in the unit or in imposition of a penalty in accordance with this policy or with Statute 10 Student Conduct and Discipline.
16. Identification of academic dishonesty
16.1 Where a Lecturer-in-Charge detects or is made aware of the possible occurrence of academic dishonesty, the Lecturer-in-Charge will arrange a consultation with the student and may then refer the matter to the Head of School for further action.
16.2 If the Lecturer-in-Charge believes that the student acted without the intention to deceive, or was otherwise not acting dishonestly, the Lecturer-in-Charge may:
- counsel the student by explaining referencing guidelines, providing a copy of this policy and referring the student to services available for assistance; and
- if appropriate, issue a written warning about the consequences of breaching University policy on academic honesty.
A copy of any warning should be:
- signed and dated by both the student and the Lecturer-in-Charge;
- retained by both the student and the Lecturer-in-Charge; and
- forwarded by the Lecturer-in-Charge to the Head of School for filing.
16.3 If the Lecturer-in-Charge believes that the student acted with the intention to deceive, or was otherwise acting dishonestly, the Lecturer-in-Charge will immediately refer the matter to the Head of School. In doing so the Lecturer-in-Charge will provide a report on investigations undertaken and all relevant materials, viz:
- the examination paper or work submitted by the student for assessment; and
- evidence of the basis on which the allegation is based, for example:
- he Supervisor’s report and any associated evidence;
- eference to and preferably copies of other resources which are considered to have been plagiarised; (a printout from any internet site is appropriate, in case that site is subsequently changed); or
- evidence of collusion or recycling.
16.4 Where any member of staff other than a lecturer-in-Charge detects or is made aware of the possible occurrence of academic dishonesty, the staff member will report the matter to the staff member’s supervisor who may refer the matter to the relevant Head of School for consideration under Section 18 of this Policy or may take action under Statute 10 Student Conduct and Discipline.
17. Hold on results while any allegation of academic dishonesty is investigated
In any case in which an allegation of academic dishonesty is referred to the Head of School or Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic), the student cannot withdraw from the unit and no result can be finalised for the unit until the investigations under this Policy are completed, the decision is communicated to the student, and the time for appeal has elapsed.
18. Consideration of any allegation of academic dishonesty
18.1 The Head of School will, within 10 working days of receipt of any allegation of academic dishonesty, initiate such investigations as considered appropriate.
18.2 If the Head of School considers that the evidence does not support the allegation, the student and the Lecturer-in-Charge or other complainant will be advised accordingly and no further action will be taken.
18.3 If the Head of School considers that the allegation has substance, he/she will notify the student in writing of the nature of the allegation/s and provide the student with a copy of this policy and with the opportunity to prepare and submit a written response to the Head. Unless otherwise specified in the particular case, the student’s response should be lodged within five working days of notification by the Head.
18.4 The Head of School may also request the student to attend for interview or provide the student with the opportunity to request an interview to discuss the allegation. At any such interview, the student may, with prior written notice to the Head of School, be accompanied by another person, other than a legal representative, who will act in the role of a neutral observer; such other person will not act in the role of advocate or spokesperson on behalf of the student, except with the specific prior permission of the Head.
18.5 The Head of School will make a decision on the matter within 20 working days of the date of notification of the allegation to the student.
19. Action which may be taken by the Head of School
19.1 Taking into account the outcome of the investigation, the student’s level of experience, reasons for or circumstances relating to the breach of standards of academic honesty and/or other instance of such breach by the student, the Head of School may:
- dismiss the case with no further action, other than counselling the student;
- issue a written warning to the student;
- require the student to resubmit the work for assessment or to undertake additional and/or remedial work in substitution for the work submitted;
- require the student to undertake another form of assessment in lieu of the assessment work in question;
- apply a fail grade to the work, or part thereof, submitted for assessment;
- impose a maximum grade for the unit (eg a maximum grade of Pass) and/or downgrade the final grade overall in the unit;
- apply a fail grade overall in the unit; or
- refuse, cancel or annul credit for any unit;
- refer the matter to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) if the Head of School considers that awarding a fail grade in the unit is insufficient to deal with the matter.
(Note: The Head of School will access the confidential Breaches of Academic Honesty file and any information it contains regarding the student’s previous history of academic dishonesty only after determining that the student is guilty of a breach in the current investigation.)
19.2 If a student has been found guilty of academic dishonesty on more than one occasion, the Head of School will refer the matter to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) who may –
- terminate the student’s enrolment in the course and exclude the student from the University for a period of up to three semesters from the date of termination; or
- impose some lesser academic penalty.
20. Notification and recording of decision
20.1 The Head of School will advise the student in writing of:
- the process undertaken during the investigation;
- the decision reached;
- the reasons for the decision; and
- available avenues of appeal.
A copy of the advice to the student will be provided to the Dean, any other relevant Head of School (eg Head of School responsible for the course in which the student is enrolled, if different), Course Coordinator, Lecturer-in-Charge and Student Administration.
20.2 The report will be filed on a confidential file on Breaches of Academic Honesty maintained in the Student Administration office on the relevant campus, with limited access. A cross reference will also be included on the personal student file.
21. Action by Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
21.1 In the event of an allegation of academic dishonesty being referred by a Head of School to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic), the Pro-Vice-Chancellor will undertake such further investigation of the case as is considered appropriate.
21.2 Following consideration of the case the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) may:
- dismiss the case;
- refer the matter to a Discipline Committee under Statute 10 Student Conduct and Discipline;
- terminate the student’s enrolment in the course and exclude the student from the University for a period of up to three standard study periods from the date of termination; or
- impose some lesser academic penalty.
21.3 Following determination of the case, the Pro-Vice-Chancellor will advise the student in writing of:
- the process undertaken during the investigation;
- the decision reached;
- the reasons for the decision; and
- available avenues of appeal.
A copy of the advice to the student will be provided to the Dean, the Head of School, Course Coordinator, Lecturer-in-Charge and Student Administration.
21.4 The report will be filed on a confidential file on Breaches of Academic Honesty maintained in the Student Administration office on the relevant campus, with limited access. A cross reference will also be included on the personal student file.
21.5 Where a student’s enrolment has been terminated or the student has been excluded under this Policy, the following provisions apply:
- where the exclusion or suspension does not exceed two weeks, the student may resume studies after the expiry of the nominated period of exclusion;
- where the exclusion exceeds two weeks, the student may not resume studies, after the expiry of the nominated period of exclusion, without first obtaining the approval of the Course Coordinator;
- where the period of exclusion is greater than one standard study period, in order to be considered for re-enrolment, the person must first submit an application for readmission which will be determined by the relevant Faculty Dean;
- if the student subsequently re-enrols, no credit may be granted for any studies or other learning or practical experience undertaken at this University or elsewhere during the period of exclusion or suspension.
22. Avenues of appeal 5
22.1 Appeal against decision by a Head by School
22.1.1 A student may appeal to the Dean against the decision of a Head of School, other than a decision to refer the matter to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) under Section 15(h) above.
22.1.2 An appeal must be lodged in writing within 10 working days of advice of the decision to the student. An appeal may be requested only on the grounds that published University policy or procedures have not been observed.
22.1.3 The Dean will undertake such further investigation of the case and make such determination as is considered appropriate. The Dean will advise the student in writing of the outcome of the appeal within 20 working days of receipt of the appeal; such advice will outline:
- the process undertaken during the investigation;
- the decision reached; and
- the reasons for the decision.
22.2 Appeal against decision by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
A student may appeal against the decision of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Academic) to an Appeals Committee established under Statute 10 Student Conduct and Discipline.
Page last updated: 2017-06-29
Short url: https://handbook.acu.edu.au/111471
Page last updated: 2017-06-29
Short url: https://handbook.acu.edu.au/111471